The new law is meant to encourage companies to add women and minorities to their boards—but critics contend it’s not strong enough
Previous versions would have required Illinois-based publicly traded companies to have at least one woman, one African American and one Latino on their boards. A Crain’s analysis found if the early version of the bill passed, just 12 of Chicago’s 40 largest corporations would be in full compliance.
The bill signed today requires companies to turn over data to the Illinois secretary of state about female and minority board membership, as well as practices for identifying and appointing diverse leadership. The University of Illinois will study board demographic makeup and grade each corporation according to a rating system it will develop. The university will also publish aggregate data annually.
The U of I rating system would consider “compliance with the demographic reporting obligations . . . policies and practices for encouraging diversity in recruitment, board membership, and executive appointments; and the demographic diversity of board seats and executive positions.”
“People care about their report card,” lead House sponsor Emanuel “Chris” Welch told Crain’s on Tuesday. “When you take that report card home, you want to be proud, you want your parents to see it and give you pats on the back. These corporations are going to want that same thing. This report card is going to make a world of difference.”
The law does not touch private business—Pritzker’s own investment firm, Pritzker Group, employed few women in senior positions, according to a Chicago Tribune review.
Pritzker said he “had been making attempts for several years to try to increase the diversity of our organizations, of the board at our organizations, of the leadership,” he said, adding he reached out to Ariel Investments CEO John Rogers for advice. “We need more attention on this subject . . . to have strategies for making those changes.”
Welch said legislators must tread carefully when dealing with private companies, but “I do believe that when they watch and see what happens with the public companies and how they profit from diversity, private companies are going to want to follow suit.”
“I will say, we are looking at private companies that do public business. That’s something we’re going to be taking a close look at probably the next session,” Welch continued. “Right now, our lawyers are still looking at it. We’re hoping that we can file similar legislation that can require them to have diverse corporate boards because they do public work” in 2020.